Comments on: This Bulb

By: PhuqueU

PhuqueU — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:58:38 +0000

Big lie, they make electricity for free using Tesla Technology.
No green house gases, just Chemtrail Barium

By: PhuqueU

PhuqueU — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:53:23 +0000

Don’t you love Hollywood Casting Couch Whores
who will say anything for a buck?

By: vibratingstring

vibratingstring — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:55:15 +0000

That’s a bit vacuous, no? I have always turned off lights when not using them, used 40W rather than 60W where sufficient, drive a small car, take the train, ride my bike…

But I don’t like poisons like mercury when there are other solutions. I don’t like the gvmt telling me what bulb to use–I can (and do) ration my energy just fine without them.

Furthermore, fluorescents really give me a headache. Went to the library today and had to leave after 20mins.

By: Ilsdrak

Ilsdrak — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:43:57 +0000

@XXxESPxXX
hahaha FUCK YEAH periphery ftw

By: XXxESPxXX

XXxESPxXX — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:24:10 +0000

This bulb can’t play zyglrox like a bulb I know….

By: jacosci

jacosci — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:30:55 +0000

The bulb can help save the plant but we need to do alot moreto save the plant. The bulb is good if it is diposed of properly. If inproperly it may do alot more damage then good considering that one of the bulbs main materials is mercury.

By: onechange

onechange — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:09:38 +0000

Great video, the light bulb is the gateway to broader environmental action, that first simple action people can take to save money and use less energy. Once people start changing bulbs they go to make more positive changes.

By: vibratingstring

vibratingstring — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:04:18 +0000

Not if I can help it. I am starting a grass roots movement to REPEAL the incandescent ban.

By: vibratingstring

vibratingstring — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:33:48 +0000

9. A significant portion of the polulation get hedaches or triple vision when reading for more than 5 minutes in fluorescent light. We actually disable the fluorescent bulbs in our offices and put in incadescents. Why force everyone to use something that is unhealthy for a significant protion of the

8. LED is easily used in a dimmer. CFL requires expensive replacement of dimmers.

By: vibratingstring

vibratingstring — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:33:08 +0000

6. LED technology will obsolete the mercury CFL, but it may take just a few more years before the cost curves cross. Why are we forcing a very bad public health policy (incandescent ban), when with just a little more time, a much better solution will manifest naturally. Again, people quit candles without being forced. It just made sense.

7. LED technology does not emit UV light. CFL does. Paintings and fabrics are damaged by UV (and fluorescent light).